4 Comments
User's avatar
Thaddeusss's avatar

Good article.

The notion of concrete action vs intellectual theorizing needs to be mentioned more.

Because in reality, as you said, the bishops, who make things happen in the Church, hold to the rupture aspect of Dignitatis Humanae, and the entire Church leadership follows suit.

almachius's avatar

Well written, and generous too. Keep up the good work. Deo gratias.

Chris Mah's avatar

To be perfectly honest your defense of Father Pagliarrani's statements pertaining to the liturgy is a Motte and Baily.

You know very well that the SSPX consider the very NO missal to be deficient and therefore evil. Citing the worst examples of abuses does not defend that position it distracts from it.

If I cite all the SSPXs abuses that speaks nothing to whether or not there is a "state of nessesity."

Mark Gross's avatar

Pleasant surprise, thank you.

Do you really think Prevost supports the traditional teaching on religious freedom? In regard to whom, as my Baptist Grandma used to say, "Your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you are saying."

I enjoyed the note on successful arguments having their existance in the mind, and contradicted by observed reality.